Browsing the archives for the Film category

Animated Horror

4 Comments
Arts, Film

I’m a big fan of animation, as readers of this blog will already know. I’m particularly fond of animated horror, which seems to me to touch a deeper place in the psyche than the generic stuff. It also tends to concentrate less on gore and more on scaring you to the depths of your self. Last year’s Coraline was a great example of this – the best I’ve ever seen of a full-length animated horror film but I thought I’d share a few less well-known ones here.

I here present to you three of my favourite animated shorts. First, a CGI short called Alma, is also newest, with a nice innocent opening, and an ending as dark as it is inevitable. (Thanks to Dee for finding this for me.)

Incidentally, this video may answer some questions for anyone who’s curious as to where I’ve been lately.

Second up is The Cat With Hands, a creepy, stylish little gothic story I first came upon through Neil Gaiman’s blog.

Last, and by far my favourite, is another stylised gothic short, The Sandman. This stop-motion animation I first saw flicking through channels when I was about eleven or twelve, and is the only film to have ever cost me sleep (and quite a lot of it at that). It took me years to track it down, having been desperate to see it again, but I never forgot the last scene, which plays over the closing credits. Many thanks to Paddy, who unwittingly found this for me.

On Pixar and Saleability

No Comments
Arts, Film

I came across an article today, essentially saying that Pixar’s films are successful, but not commercially viable enough to make theme park rides out of. This is not the first time this year that a story like concerning Pixar this has emerged: after the screening of their new film, Up, at Cannes this year, Wall Street condemned Pixar for not being more mainstream in order to fight recession.

Yes, it’s true that Pixar are a very good money-making brand, but this is surely largely due to their being the (as far as I’m concerned) only major film studio in the US to show consistent integrity and dedication to quality. Every Pixar film to date, with the possible exception of Cars, has been a masterpiece, and Pixar will be remembered for making them as fondly in sixty years as Disney are for their films of the early twentieth century. But what analysts don’t seem to realise is that it is because of Pixar’s creativity and integrity that their films are so good, and it is because they’re so good that they’re so successful. The minute they become the kind of studio that churns out attempts at box office ’smashes’, they will lose that. They will also lose the faith that their fans have in them to always make a great film. Disney, Pixar’s parent company, should know this better than anyone.

Though they regularly come under fire for it, Disney are wise to leave Pixar largely to their own devices. As long as they do so, Pixar will continue to make money for the company, and get the great PR that comes with working with a company that hasn’t yet turned out anything of inferior quality. It also means that Disney can keep hold of its claim to have produced nearly all of the great American animated films. (Apart from the amazing The Iron Giant, I cannot think of a single great American animated film to have come from any other studio.)

I must say, I am a little concerned about Pixar’s next two films: both are sequels. That said, I was wrong about Toy Story 2, and I can’t imagine Pixar would have gone ahead with Toy Story 3 or Cars 2 if they hadn’t thought they would make them good films. But the reason I love Pixar (and the animation company apparently beloved of Pixar, Hayao Miyazaki’s Studio Ghibli) is because of their ability to create new worlds, populate them, and use them to tell entertaining stories with interesting characters. It just feels to me like a shame that we won’t be seeing any new Pixar worlds for at least another couple of years.

That said, I still have Up to look forward to.

Secrets and Mysteries

No Comments
Film, Reviews

I can’t help thinking it’s a sad indicator of the state of the film industry that my two favourite films so far this year have been children’s films. (Though I do agree with some people’s suggestion that 90% of material produced in any medium is probably dross, with film you’re talking about budgets similar to those of small nations, and I think a little more care should be taken.)

The first of these films I saw was the Irish animation The Secret of Kells. Gorgeously presented in old-school, hand drawn animation, this film told the story of a young boy working at a monastery in Kells, taken under wing by an older monk who convinces him to help make the Book of Kells – a bible beautiful enough to be worthy of god’s word. Naturally, as it’s Irish Christianity we’re dealing with, there’s a good deal of fairy-taling and magic woven into the plot, too.

The second was the children’s horror Coraline, from Henry Selick. This stop-motion animation tells the story of a smart-alec young girl who finds a magical door which leads to a fantasy world. This world seems an improvement on her own in many ways, but the facade crumbles and leads to some truly terrifying moments – terrifying in the way I’ve found only children’s horror can really be.

I enjoy films (or any art form) that exploit their medium’s strengths, and both these films do so wonderfully. The Secret of Kells, set in medieval Ireland, uses the artistic style of that time as a basis for its own drawings. This is established right from the outset, with the opening ‘aeriel’ shot which shows the monastery from directly above, but with the tower shown as though pointed north rather than up. These little effects continue throughout the film, and always delight – from the group of monks who move en masse, to the use of the full width of the cinema screen to create tapestry-like panoramas. Coraline uses 3-d effects quite frequently, without over-doing them, and the fact of its stop-motion animation helps give it a weight and realism more than you get with computer animation (Pixar excepted) while also keeping its distance from reality through the ‘cartoonish’ style of its characters.

Unlike most ‘adult’ films these days, neither of these films is afraid to take risks. Coraline’s proxy mother is as terrifying a figure as any evil stepmother from Grimm’s tales, and we see the Vikings in the Secret of Kells as a merciless invading force. Neither film is short on scares, but then children’s fiction – the really popular, important stuff – never has been.

Incidentally, both these films had superb soundtracks – Secret of Kells by the innovative trad group Kíla, and Coraline by the French film composer Bruno Coulais.

Edit: Since writing this, I’ve discovered that Coulais in fact wrote the score for both films, but The Secret of Kells partly in collaboration with Kíla, who performed most of it.